We had a lunatic named Llyod post quite an interesting message on the Where's Willy? public forum yesterday.. I thought you all would get a kick out of it. Enjoy.
<a target=_blank href=http://www.whereswilly.com/forums/pf_main/messages/1021842479_9996.html>http://www.whereswilly.com/forums/pf_main/messages/1021842479_9996.html</a>
-Hank
HAHAHAHA what a loser… I read a few messages after that, hes the laughing stock of the willy site. Maybe it was a joke, gee i hope so..
Hey thanks Hank…I think the most important part was from one of your responders who said that the President of the Bank of Canada said on CBC 'it is frowned upon but not illegal'.
Hey thanks Hank…I think the most important part was from one of your responders who said that the President of the Bank of Canada said on CBC 'it is frowned upon but not illegal'.
Hey thanks Hank…I think the most important part was from one of your responders who said that the President of the Bank of Canada said on CBC 'it is frowned upon but not illegal'.
Sorry for all the repeats…I kept getting error messages when sending my reply, so I used the back button and tried again.
Now that is funny.
What worries me is that towards the end of the thread, one WW user suggests that it might have been one of us!
That is indeed funny. Thanks for that, Hank!
Pooga wrote:
What worries me is that towards the end of the thread, one WW user suggests that it might have been one of us!
I wouldn't worry about that. It is very possible that the guy has registered here also, but "James in London" probably wasn't thinking clearly at the time or just doesn't know us regulars very well. we know better than that and really, they are just like us, but hang out at a different site.
-dr
I agree with DR. What james said was:
…I wonder if this is one of those guys from the "other site" having fun on our site.
I read that as an innocent supposition (sp?) with no malice intended.
I agree with CJ…but now I have to wonder about that other one shown on our board, with the AAA1**7 number, with both entries in the US, and a pro-Dark Site comment.
They probably entered the bill as revenge for one of us supposodley(?) writing that message. Hopefully it won't turn into a full scale war again.
I don't think so. That bill was originally entered on May 10, 2002, and just on May 20, so either someone was planning something or I have no idea where I was going.
Maybe we should take our famous 6-hit radar over there!
No, I guess not, I don't remember the serial number.
I would just let it die a quiet death, no use provoking them.
This topic has been locked by a moderator.