Message |
Date: |
2009-12-13 |
|
Author: |
rudyk |
|
Subject: |
re: if *I* were running the site... |
Sramic comments:
'often longer than 30 days?' how about 230 days?? haha. I think there should be red flags for when newly entered bills get instant hits.
ahh... a constructive reply! :) indeed, sramic, my suggestion would certainly take care of those instances. and i chose 30 days to be the period somewhat arbitrarily -- the true median would certainly be much larger (as you correctly note!) but i think 30 days would ensure some sort of reasonable period.
as for the red flags... not to worry, i have complied a long list that could be entitled a "red flag list". it was started when dr first suggested a programme for vetting hits.
|
|
|
[Next]
|