Message |
Date: |
2009-01-29 |
Author: |
davetoms |
|
Subject: |
re: Legality |
Message: |
Nice!
Thank you for your enlightening response!
As with most Canadian laws, although an action is technically (or in this case, *possibly*) illegal: it doesn't really matter; no one's ever been charged; and though some institutions care in principal, they don't give a real rat's ass in practice.
Fantastic.
Makes me proud to be Canadian!
|
|
[Prev]
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
[Next]
|
Subject * |
Author |
Date |
re: QuiET | captain super smooth | 2009-02-20 |
re: QuiET | Dellap | 2009-02-22 |
re: QuiET | wally69me | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | gouche92 | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | J-Lynn | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | BANKCOLLECTOR | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | dr | 2009-03-01 |
re: QuiET | Cityscape | 2009-03-01 |
re: QuiET | gouche92 | 2009-03-01 |
re: QuiET | dr | 2009-03-01 |
new prefix $5/$100 | pierre212 | 2009-02-15 |
re: new prefix $5/$100 | gouche92 | 2009-02-16 |
New $100 note prefix | gouche92 | 2009-02-21 |
re: New $100 note prefix | rudyk | 2009-02-22 |
re: New $100 note prefix | BDKINGSTON | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | BANKCOLLECTOR | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | rudyk | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | Pooga | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | wally69me | 2009-02-23 |
re: new $100 note prefix | BANKCOLLECTOR | 2009-02-23 |
re: new $100 note prefix | pierre212 | 2009-02-26 |
Legality | davetoms | 2009-01-29 |
re: Legality | gouche92 | 2009-01-29 |
re: Legality | Cityscape | 2009-01-29 |
re: Legality <<< | davetoms | 2009-01-29 |
|
[Prev]
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
[Next]
|