Message |
Date: |
2009-02-22 |
Author: |
rudyk |
|
Subject: |
re: New $100 note prefix |
Message: |
pierre212... i'd be a tad wary about spending this banknote... there is no record of this s/n prefix ever being used for that denomination -- did you check all the security features on that note? if you still have it, you might want to take it to a bank for verification.
(note that no such prefix has been seen at the other money-tracking sites, it doesn't exist in any of the paper money forums and the most recent Charlton catalogue suggests that it has never been used)
|
|
[Prev]
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
[Next]
|
Subject * |
Author |
Date |
re: QuiET | captain super smooth | 2009-02-20 |
re: QuiET | Dellap | 2009-02-22 |
re: QuiET | wally69me | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | gouche92 | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | J-Lynn | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | BANKCOLLECTOR | 2009-02-23 |
re: QuiET | dr | 2009-03-01 |
re: QuiET | Cityscape | 2009-03-01 |
re: QuiET | gouche92 | 2009-03-01 |
re: QuiET | dr | 2009-03-01 |
new prefix $5/$100 | pierre212 | 2009-02-15 |
re: new prefix $5/$100 | gouche92 | 2009-02-16 |
New $100 note prefix | gouche92 | 2009-02-21 |
re: New $100 note prefix <<< | rudyk | 2009-02-22 |
re: New $100 note prefix | BDKINGSTON | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | BANKCOLLECTOR | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | rudyk | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | Pooga | 2009-02-22 |
re: new $100 note prefix | wally69me | 2009-02-23 |
re: new $100 note prefix | BANKCOLLECTOR | 2009-02-23 |
re: new $100 note prefix | pierre212 | 2009-02-26 |
Legality | davetoms | 2009-01-29 |
re: Legality | gouche92 | 2009-01-29 |
re: Legality | Cityscape | 2009-01-29 |
re: Legality | davetoms | 2009-01-29 |
|
[Prev]
[ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
[Next]
|